Find out more about Good Shepherd Lutheran School in our prospectus.

as a bizarre love triangle results in which Viola is in love with Orsino.

cynicismabout love or the need for affection between sexual partners

Objection: How can you say that the only motive that can excuse the marital act is the procreation of children? It is not against the Natural Law or the Law of the Church to excuse intercourse for the sake of pleasure, health, or love. You are wrong when you say that one must perform the marital act for the purpose or motive of begetting children, and that the procreation of children is the only primary purpose or motive that a couple can use to excuse the marital act. There are many primary purposes or motives of marriage that excuse the marital act from being sinful. One can perform the marital act for many primary reasons such as for the sole purpose or motive of health, satisfying the fleshly lust, quenching concupiscence, mutual help, paying the marital debt, as well as for cultivating mutual love and unitive purposes. Any one of these purposes or motives are enough to perform the marital act in a lawful way, and this proves that spouses can perform sexual acts that are not intended or able to procreate in themselves.

Lustful kisses and touches between spouses aredefinitely mortal sins

Answer: Not so, since the Church and Pope Pius XI, aswe have seen, teaches that the primary end or motive of the marital sexual actis the procreation of children, while he describes the other ends or motives ofthe marital act (if spouses choose to perform the act for these reasons) assecondary ends or motives that are not necessary for the act to be lawful andthat are dependent on and which must follow the primary motive of procreationin order for the sexual act to be lawful. The teaching of the Natural Law aswell as that of the Church is clear that “ (PopePius XI, #54) and this is also why Pope Pius XI teachesthat spouses are not forbidden to consider the secondary ends of marriage “suchas mutual aid, the cultivating of mutual love [unitive purpose], and the quietingof concupiscence... so long as they are subordinated to the primary end andso long as the intrinsic nature of the act is preserved.” This proves that allother motives than the procreation of children are secondary ends or motives.

Pope Pius XI, (# 59), Dec. 31, 1930:“For in matrimony as well as in the use of the matrimonial right thereare also secondary ends, such as mutual aid, the cultivating of mutual love,and the quieting of concupiscence which husband and wife are notforbidden to consider SO LONG AS THEY ARE SUBORDINATED TO THE PRIMARY END and so long as the intrinsic nature of the act ispreserved [that is, all sexual acts must be able to procreate in themselves,which means that no unnatural and non-procreative form of a sexual act can everbe performed without sin].”


Master Essay: Thesis Statement About Love Vs. Lust …

The Holy Bible, Tobias 6:22; 8:9 “And when the third nightis past, thou shalt take the virgin with the fear of the Lord, moved ratherfor love of children than for lust, that in the seed of Abraham thou mayestobtain a blessing in children… [Tobias said:] And now, Lord, thou knowest, thatnot for fleshly lust do I take my sister to wife, but only for the loveof posterity, in which thy name may be blessed for ever and ever.”

Lust vs Love: Do You Know the Difference? | Psychology Today

The Holy Bible, Tobias 6:22; 8:9 “And when the third nightis past, thou shalt take the virgin with the fear of the Lord, moved ratherfor love of children than for lust, that in the seed of Abraham thou mayestobtain a blessing in children… [Tobias said:] And now, Lord, thou knowest, thatnot for fleshly lust do I take my sister to wife, but only for the loveof posterity, in which thy name may be blessed for ever and ever.”

Lust vs Love: Do You Know the Difference?

The holy youth Tobias approached his bride Sara after threedays of prayer, not for fleshly lust but only for the love of posterity, havingbeen instructed by the Archangel Raphael that to engage in the marital act heshall “be moved rather for love of children than for lust”.

do my essay me uk Thesis Statement On Love dissertation ..

Therefore, even though NFP does not directly interfere withthe marital , as its defenders love to stress, it makes nodifference. NFP is condemned because it subordinates the primary end(or purpose) of marriage and the marriage act (the procreation andeducation of children) to the secondary ends.