What Is The Hegelian Dialectic? – Return Of Kings

Nevertheless, reasoning of this sort remains a popular pastime among convinced .

The Opposite Of The Thesis In The Dialectic Is The



Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel introduced a system for understanding the history of philosophy and the world itself, often called a "dialectic": a progression in which each successive movement emerges as a solution to the contradictions inherent in the preceding movement.

According to , this is the which accounts for the existence and nature of a thing.

Dialectic of thesis antithesis and synthesis - Goffinet

- State your thesis clearly, using a thesis indicator such as “I will argue…” If you are discussing the claim of a thinker, make sure you give an accurate representation of the claim. The easiest way to do this is to quote it directly.

...through the inexorable dialectic of evolution, it must happen....

The claim that individuals, unlike nations, are particularly vulnerable is ultimately convincing. As a matter of fact, the intervention of NATO in Yugoslavia has a key purpose of protecting individuals. Because that is what we value, we are prepared to treat nations differently than individuals, especially in cases where individuals are being harmed. Our concern about the vulnerability of nations rests on the concern for the vulnerability of its citizens. As a result, when nations threaten citizens, the same protections against abuse we uphold for individuals are no longer justified. So NATO’s action is not only well-intentioned, but also well justified.

For that is what dogma's are -- the crystallizations of some dominant system of thought ....


hence the opposite of communicating or not being able to communicate

Hence, the suggestion that Hegel's dialectic of becoming is a"mirage" which "takes place only on paper," or that Hegel "could notaccount for becoming" or "the transition from possibility toactuality," is completely unwarranted. This sort of criticismreflects, I suppose, a distaste for Hegel's idealism in general,where the truth of the being of objects is ultimately the "thingthought'' the object for-consciousness. This leads Kierkegaard andothers to the conclusion that becoming and dialectic only occur forHegel "in the head" and not in concrete existents in the world. Butthis is simply not Hegel's view, for, as we have seen, the fact isthat the exemplification and manifestation of that truth takes placein concretely situated beings in the world. Hegel makes this point,which is the very crux of his grand synthesis, endlessly. The man of" 'sound common sense' . . . holds the opinion that philosophy isconcerned only with ['thought-things or mentalentities]." But, Hegel continues, while philosophy "does have to dowith these pure essences too," its task is to recognize how they are"concretely embodied in existing things" (PhS 78f).

antithesis represents the counter-opinion or opposite ..

"Hegel's dialectic often appears broken up for convenience into three moments called "thesis" (in the French historical example, the revolution), "antithesis" (the terror which followed), and "synthesis" (the constitutional state of free citizens). ... Much Hegel scholarship does not recognize the usefulness of this triadic classification for shedding light on Hegel's thought. Although Hegel refers to "the two elemental considerations: first, the idea of freedom as the absolute and final aim; secondly, the means for realising it, i.e. the subjective side of knowledge and will, with its life, movement, and activity" (thesis and antithesis) he doesn't use "synthesis" but instead speaks of the "Whole": "We then recognised the State as the moral Whole and the Reality of Freedom, and consequently as the objective unity of these two elements." ...

"Hegel used this system of dialectics to explain the whole of the history of philosophy, science, art, politics and religion, but many modern critics point out that Hegel often seems to gloss over the realities of history in order to fit it into his dialectical mold....

In the 20th century, Hegel's philosophy underwent a major renaissance. This was due partly to the rediscovery and reevaluation of him as the philosophical progenitor of Marxism by philosophically oriented Marxists, partly through a resurgence of the historical perspective that Hegel brought to everything, and partly through increasing recognition of the importance of his dialectical method. The book that did the most to reintroduce Hegel into the Marxist canon was perhaps Georg Lukacs's History and Class Consciousness. This sparked a renewed interest in Hegel reflected in the work of Herbert Marcuse, Theodor Adorno, Ernst Bloch....

An antithesis is the complete opposite of something

"Periods of happiness are empty pages in history, for they are the periods of harmony, times when the antithesis is missing." What is left to life is simply habit, "activity without opposition." This then raises a crucial question: how can it be possible to have an end to history?