Thesis on Feuerbach: Free Pieces of Advice
In fact, it is the latter which largely secure the reproduction specifically of the relations of production, behind a ‘shield’ provided by the repressive State apparatus. It is here that the role of the ruling ideology is heavily concentrated, the ideology of the ruling class, which holds State power. It is the intermediation of the ruling ideology that ensures a (sometimes teeth-gritting) ‘harmony’ between the repressive State apparatus and the Ideological State Apparatuses, and between the different State Ideological Apparatuses.
I can find approximating it is the second thesis on Feuerbach
The eleventh thesis of Feuerbach | Noumenal Realm Jul 12, 2006 ... (Marx, Eleven Theses on Feuerbach) This used to be an important maxim, but I ...
The intellectual climate within which the young Marx worked wasdominated by the influence of Hegel, and the reaction to Hegel by agroup known as the Young Hegelians, who rejected what they regarded asthe conservative implications of Hegel’s work. The most significant ofthese thinkers was Ludwig Feuerbach, who attempted to transformHegel’s metaphysics, and, thereby, provided a critique of Hegel’sdoctrine of religion and the state. A large portion of thephilosophical content of Marx’s works written in the early 1840s is arecord of his struggle to define his own position in reaction to thatof Hegel and Feuerbach and those of the other Young Hegelians.
The Essence of Christianity by Ludwig Feuerbach
The Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts cover a widerange of topics, including much interesting material on privateproperty and communism, and on money, as well as developing Marx’scritique of Hegel. However, the manuscripts are best known for theiraccount of alienated labour. Here Marx famously depicts the workerunder capitalism as suffering from four types of alienatedlabour. First, from the product, which as soon as it is created istaken away from its producer. Second, in productive activity (work)which is experienced as a torment. Third, from species-being, forhumans produce blindly and not in accordance with their truly humanpowers. Finally, from other human beings, where the relation ofexchange replaces the satisfaction of mutual need. That thesecategories overlap in some respects is not a surprise given Marx’sremarkable methodological ambition in these writings. Essentially heattempts to apply a Hegelian deduction of categories to economics,trying to demonstrate that all the categories of bourgeois economics— wages, rent, exchange, profit, etc. — are ultimatelyderived from an analysis of the concept of alienation. Consequentlyeach category of alienated labour is supposed to be deducible from theprevious one. However, Marx gets no further than deducing categoriesof alienated labour from each other. Quite possibly in the course ofwriting he came to understand that a different methodology is requiredfor approaching economic issues. Nevertheless we are left with a veryrich text on the nature of alienated labour. The idea ofnon-alienation has to be inferred from the negative, with theassistance of one short passage at the end of the text ‘On JamesMill’ in which non-alienated labour is briefly described interms which emphasise both the immediate producer’s enjoyment ofproduction as a confirmation of his or her powers, and also the ideathat production is to meet the needs of others, thus confirming forboth parties our human essence as mutual dependence. Both sides of ourspecies essence are revealed here: our individual human powers and ourmembership in the human community.
a quotation after the second thesis about Feuerbach.
Marx, Intro to A Contribution, Estranged Labor, Theses on Feuerbach What does Marx take the meaning and importance of religion to be?